• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Longevity & Healthy Aging Research Consortium

Longevity & Healthy Aging Research Consortium

Longevity & Healthy Aging Research Center

Logevity and Healthy Aging
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
  • Leadership
  • Education
    • Research Methodology Podcasts
    • Webinar: Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (ROC) Analysis for Prediction Studies
    • Webinar: Moderator, Mediators et al: Toward Understanding Heterogeneity
  • Publications
  • News and Accomplishments
  • How to Help

Articles, Emotional Wellbeing, Featured, Physical Wellbeing, Spiritual Wellbeing, Videos

Doctors struggle with conducting end-of-life conversations with their patients

Leave your comment: 2 comments so far

A large study published in PLOS ONE identified common barriers doctors face in conducting end-of-life (EOL) conversations with their patients. 1040 doctors from various medical specialties participated in the study and only 0.01 % doctors reported no barriers to conducting EOL conversations with patients. 99.99% doctors reported barriers with 85.7% finding it very challenging to conduct EOL conversations with all patients and especially so with patients whose ethnicity was different than their own. Asian-American doctors reported the most struggles (91.3%), followed by African Americans (85.3%), Caucasians (83.5%) and Hispanic Americans (79.3%) in conducting EOL conversations with their patients.

The biggest doctor-reported barriers to effective EOL conversations are

  • language and medical interpretation issues,
  • patient/family religio-spiritual beliefs about death and dying,
  • doctors’ ignorance of patients’ cultural beliefs, values and practices,
  • patient/family’s cultural differences in truth handling and decision making,
  • patients’ limited health literacy and
  • patients’ mistrust of doctors and the health care system.

The doctors’ ethnicity and medical subspecialty influenced their reported barriers. The biggest differences across sub-specialties were seen in Emergency Medicine, Neurology, Psychiatry and Anesthesia. Emergency Medicine doctors rated the patient/family’s limited health literacy barrier as being more problematic compared to doctors in general. Neurologists rated doctors’ ignorance of patients’ cultural beliefs, values and practices as a more problematic and cultural differences in truth handling and decision making as less problematic as compared to doctors in general. Psychiatrists stated that cultural differences in truth handling and decision-making were more problematic compared to doctors in general. Anesthesiologists felt that patient/family’s limited health literacy was less of a barrier compared to doctors in general.

Doctors report struggles with conducting effective EOL conversations with all patients and especially with those whose ethnicity is different from their own.Doctors need to be trained to work effectively with patients and families from diverse religio-spiritual backgrounds and to consult and partner with chaplains and community spiritual leaders in providing necessary support to seriously ill patients and families to facilitate quality EOL decisions.

So what is the solution?

Patients need to take an active role and think about and plan for the care they want at the end of life. We urge patients to join our Letter Project and use our simple form to write a letter to your doctor about what matters most to you at the end of life. Write your letter now! Its free, easy and extremely important.
VJ Periyakoil
Twitter : @palliator

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
Next Post: High School students trained to become cultural ambassadors for aging and end of life issues »

Longevity Medicine and Healthy Aging

Connect with us

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Footer

Stanford Medicine

  • About
  • Contact
  • Maps & Directions
  • Careers

 

  • Basic Science Departments
  • Clinical Science Departments
  • Academic Programs

Healthcare

  • Stanford Health Care
  • Stanford Children’s Health
  • Clinical Trials
  •   Find People
  •   Visit Stanford
  •   Search Clinical Trials
  •   Give a Gift

Copyright © 2025 Stanford Medicine
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use

Next-Generation Artificial Intelligence for Diagnosis: From Predicting Diagnostic Labels to "Wayfinding"

Julia Adler-Milstein, PhD1; Jonathan H. Chen, MD, PhD; Gurpreet Dhaliwal, MD

Improving the diagnostic process is a quality and safety priority.With the digitization of health records and rapid expansion of health data, the cognitive demand on the diagnostician has increased. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) to assist human cognition has the potential to reduce this demand and associated diagnostic errors. However, current AI tools have not realized this potential, due in part to the long-standing focus of these tools on predicting final diagnostic labels instead of helping clinicians navigate the dynamic refinement process of diagnosis. This Viewpoint highlights the importance of shifting the role of diagnostic AI from predicting labels to “wayfinding” (interpreting context and providing cues that guide the diagnostician).